Switch to the dark mode that's kinder on your eyes at night time.

Switch to the light mode that's kinder on your eyes at day time.


Editor’s Pick: Hot Air on Palin v. NYT Jury Being Tainted By Judge


February 17th, 2022 10:57 AM

On Wednesday, Hot Air Senior Editor Allahpundit reported: “Every lawyer I know on Twitter was stupefied at Judge Jed Rakoff’s decision a few days ago to toss Sarah Palin’s defamation suit against the New York Times….What the Twitter lawyers were shocked by was Rakoff’s timing.” He explained that “the jury wasn’t sequestered,” before citing NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik pointing out that “Rakoff says ‘several’ jurors said they had ‘involuntarily’ received smartphone alerts informing them judge had already decided to dismiss case before verdict.”

“All Rakoff had to do was wait until the verdict was in. If the jurors found the Times not liable — which they ultimately did — then he wouldn’t have needed to issue his ruling,” Allahpundit observed, before concluding: “Instead he announced his ruling before the verdict was in, potentially giving Palin cause for appeal. What was he thinking?”

Read the full article at Hot Air.

What do you think?

Leave a Reply


CNNEE Breaks Latino Media’s Silence on Durham Probe, Dismisses as Conservative Conspiracy


CNNEE rompe silencio de los medios latinos sobre informe de Durham, lo descarta como conspiración de conservadores

Back to Top
Translate »

Log In

Forgot password?

Don't have an account? Register

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

To use social login you have to agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. %privacy_policy%

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.